Let’s talk more philosophy!
Life is all about balance, and lately this is something that
I’ve been struggling with. I’ve drawn an idea of the importance of balance from
Shakespeare’s Othello, which we
recently studied at school. One of the things it deals with, as many tragedies do, are the extremes of binary opposites:
white and black, good an evil, civility and savagery, reason and passion.
Another of these binaries I’ve noticed among people is that of idealism and
cynicism.
Idealism looks towards the infinite. Pure idealists are
hopeful, spiritual and noble people who persevere through life with adamant
optimism. Pure cynics, meanwhile, are centred in sound reality; that which they
understand and know to be true. They know that sentimentality has little
weighting in the true harshness of our world.
I find myself constantly caught between these two
philosophical dispositions. When I speak of love and hopes and dreams, people
think I’m too cheesy and gushy. When I question and criticise our traditional
understanding of the world, I’m branded a pretentious left-winger. Life is full
of contradiction, and if Othello taught me anything, it’s that a balance these
perceived binaries is the way to avoid tragedy.
Such problems arise when an idealistic sceptic and a
sentimental atheist decides to share his views. People frown and say he has
“double standards” or that he is merely “stirring the pot to create
controversy, when things are working well enough the way they are, thank you
very much”. “The politicians are doing the best they can, so stop whinging”.
“Who is going to listen to you, of all the smarter people in the world?”. By far
one of the worst accusations is “evangelist”, as if some kind of new cult of
radicalism is being started up.
My more drastic ideas, such as my opinion that gender roles
should be discarded, do come into a bad press. But as an idealist, I cannot
help but weep to see the devolution of Russia’s human rights or Australia’s
xenophobic policies towards refugees. As a cynic, I see all the implications of
my speaking out, and how it might put some people off.
But even if I am fighting a losing battle, at least I’m
fighting the right one, or at least what I believe to be right (in a hundred
years I might be considered completely immoral, but that’s called contextual
morality, and it’s a story for another day). At least I am refusing, like all
the great people I admire from Dr King to Joan of Arc, to accept the backwards
world I live in. At least I am trying, in some small way, to do what I can to
help and not sit idly by, even if nobody wants to listen.
And that is my rant for today. If you want to continue the
discussion, please comment.
By the way, it gives me the greatest pleasure to announce
that Ravenclaw has won the poll on “Which Hogwarts House appeals to you the
most?” It seems I am read (or at least skimmed over) by kindred spirits.
I hope you all like this month’s question and I’ll be
interested to see what you think!
Everyone stay calm and reduce harm. Assume nothing and
question everything. But don’t afraid to stand up, be honest and reach for the
ideal.
:)
No comments:
Post a Comment